The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. As likely
hoax. Note I am discarding the last !vote "Keep but question truthfulness as a possible hoax" makes no sense whatsoever. §
FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. All existing sources are fake and nothing on any search. Article appears to have been here since 2010.
Pincrete (
talk) 22:14, 29 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete as a hoax. Refs are non-existent, unable to find any confirmation that this boxer exists.
Fyddlestix (
talk) 22:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as above; fabrication.
Eagleash (
talk) 23:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep but question truthfulness as a possible hoax. Internet search turns up some results but I thinm that they may have been published by the page creator or someone related because they don't seem like they're real to me. Article tagged with {{hoax}}.
Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (
talk) 00:46, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.