The result of the debate was Speedy delete by Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC). See below for details reply
Article is verbatim copy of marketing cruft for musician on commercial website (which by itself makes it either a vanity article or a copyvio); [1] the artist does not appear on allmusic.com or discogs.com; [2] [3] the article lists a single album with a record label that has precisely one Google hit, to this very Wikipedia article [4] – suggesting a vanity record publication, and not in compliance with Wikipedia:Notability (music) or Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines; entire history of article is from one anon username with no history on any other article, and one IP address with no contributions outside the three days in which the entire history of this article is listed. [5] [6] [7] - Reaverdrop ( talk/ nl/ wp:space) 03:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC) reply