The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
To my opinion plain advertising and copyvio from
[1].
The Bannertalk 00:08, 29 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment. This is pretty much a promotional page, but a search is bringing up enough to give me slight pause at applying the napalm. This is one of those cases where there's a lot of trivial mentions but not really any in-depth coverage from what I can see. I'll do a cleanup and look for sources, but I don't think I'll find any that would give him enough notability for an article.
Tokyogirl79 (
talk) 04:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete. This guy is more notable than some of the other "associated with Hollywood A-listers" people that have had articles on here, but ultimately he still falls short of what we'd need to show notability. Anderson has a ton of trivial mentions in various places, but no amount of trivial sources will add up to give notability enough to keep an article. I've found three sources, but these are not enough to show notability. There's tons of primary sources that show various celebrities and singers praising him, but those are ultimately primary sources and can't show notability. Notability isn't inherited by being associated with people who do pass
WP:GNG, so ultimately I'm forced to vote delete. I have no problem with anyone that might want to userfy a copy of the article in the hopes that more sources become available in the future.
Tokyogirl79 (
talk) 04:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Seems like advertising and copyvio. --
Wikipedical (
talk) 06:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete as per
WP:N. A mere mention in the articles of the artists he treated may be enough, or even too much.
Fauban (
talk) 10:17, 29 September 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.