From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 13:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Rolf Veldman

Rolf Veldman (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessman. Fails WP:GNG. Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 12:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 12:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad ( talk) 12:38, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Not nearly notable at this time. gidonb ( talk) 14:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Not notable Kadermonkey ( talk) 15:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • As author and original poster, I have added various corroborating internal and external links to show that Mr. Veldman is indeed more notable than originally indicated. My bad! I hope that will suffice? Thank you for your consideration! Carelfc ( talk) 16:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all that's been done now is a significant WP:REFBOMBing of non-notability lending references. Some of these don't even mention the subject (such as a link to an online Stanford certificate program and the homepage for a provincial government website). Best, GPL93 ( talk) 17:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • WP:REFBOMBing was unintentional and has been removed. I guess one only learns by doing and I'm doing my best. Thanks for the criticism; I'm learning. Carelfc ( talk) 19:05, 4 June 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.