Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robinsons_Place_Dasmariñas_(2nd_nomination) References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Robinsons Place Dasmariñas

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

as per last AfD. fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. no inherent notability of shopping malls.

also nominating:

LibStar ( talk) 02:39, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete as per the nominator. No evidence of notability. Ajf773 ( talk) 08:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 30 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete all per WP:PROMO and WP:DIRECTORY. These article exist for promotional purposes only. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:48, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.