The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Biography, sourced entirely to raw tables of election results but for a single news article in which he's a namecheck and not the subject, of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate for political office. This is not a claim of
notability that passes
WP:NPOL — if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced claim that the topic was already notable enough for a Wikipedia article for some other reason before they became a candidate, then they do not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until they win the election. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as I see no better convincing notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KTC (
talk) 00:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 00:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete, never won any elections, no sources except for election statistics.--
Ymblanter (
talk) 09:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.