The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild ( talk) 19:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Robert F. Wescott

Robert F. Wescott (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, written by a user with an obvious COI. All the sources are either primary sources from people he's worked for, or links to his publications. Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 ( talk) 15:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete - Clearly non-notable. At least not from what is written on the the article, nor from what can be gathered from a web search. The subject has not been widely covered as a main topic by third-party reliable sources, he has not received nor being nominated several times to receive well-known awards, and it seems he has not made long-lasting profound contributions to his field. His work, by itself, doesn't look notable either. Bottom line, I don't see any reason why the subject should be included in the encyclopedia. -- Legion fi ( talk) 18:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Seems pretty much non-notable. His biggest claim to fame was that he was once an adviser to the Clinton administration. The 'Selected Works' section in the article has one item, the only thing that he is perhaps vaguely noted for, and he's the second author of that. Was an academic, now runs a consultancy. Seems unlikely to produce anything groundbreaking now. Poltair ( talk) 18:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.