From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Rob Tetrault

Rob Tetrault (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a portfolio manager with a wealth management firm, not referenced to sufficient reliable source coverage about him to get him over WP:GNG. Most of the references here are either the firm's own self-published content about itself or glancing namechecks of Tetrault's existence as a giver of soundbite in coverage of other things -- but a person has to be the subject of coverage in reliable sources, not just get quoted in coverage about other subjects, to get over GNG. And the only two sources here that are both independent and more than just soundbitingly about him are just covering him in the context of organizing a local charity ball hockey tournament, not anything that would pass a Wikipedia inclusion criterion. There's also a very real advertorial tinge here, making it very unsurprising that the creator self-declares paid editing on their userpage (although not specifically in conjunction with this article yet). None of the content or sourcing here is adequate grounds for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat ( talk) 20:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete - non-notable for the reasons clearly listed above by Bearcat. Jack1956 ( talk) 19:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 01:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 01:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.