The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The subject of this article does not meet the guidelines for notability and the article content shows bias to the subject matter being described. The person being described in this article does not qualify as notable in the Wikipedia sense. Thank you.NameShiba (
talk)
01:24, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Strong keep (Noting for full transparency that I created this article, and have continued to be involved in editing this article.) There is an ongoing campaign,
coordinated offwiki, to whitewash
Epik (domain registrar) (the company of which Rob Monster is CEO). That has been unsuccessful, and so the nominator has now nominated both that article (at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epik (domain registrar)) and this one for deletion. Monster has not become less notable since the last time the article was nominated for deletion, though I will say he doesn't seem to have gained any further coverage in any kind of sourcing we could use, either. But he's pretty clearly (in my opinion) notable in his own right—while he is known for his work as the CEO of Epik, he has also made a name for himself through his commentary on various political topics. In the first deletion nomination there was some talk of merging/redirecting his article to the article on Epik, but that content could not reasonably be merged to the Epik article without making it a
WP:COATRACK.
GorillaWarfare(talk)01:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.