- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 09:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Roam Research
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Roam Research ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable product. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 01:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This is the only non- WP:UGC source I could find, and a single source is not enough to pass GNG. Advice for the article writer: A Twitter hashtag is not a source. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 02:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, obviously not notable. At least the article appears to be have been created with good intent by its creator though, but still, it fails WP:GNG. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 13:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, no valid refs and no sense that this can pass GNG (either too soon or never). David notMD ( talk) 13:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, as WP:NOTPROMOTION. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.