- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Road 89 (Iran)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Road 89 (Iran) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. I cannot find any evidence that Road 89 actually exists. The Google Map between the purported termini does not show any road labels (where it does show others in the area. One of the two provided sources is a map that shows multiple labels on the route, none that match the Farsi script for 89. The other source appears to be about the paving of a road in Gowharan, Hormozgan, but it says nothing about Road 89. The Wikipedia article List of roads and highways in Iran has nothing on it. With the sources failing verification and no other sources to be found, even if it exists, it's certainly not notable. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 16:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Iran. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 16:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nomination. GeographicAccountant ( talk) 01:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Articles which are entirely unverifiable actively harm Wikipedia's accuracy and reliability and should be deleted in all cases. Another editor raised this issue on the article creator's talk page to no response. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 17:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, we shouldn't keep articles roads that are debatable whether or not they even exist. - Samoht27 ( talk) 18:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG. Possibly a WP:HOAX? Let'srun ( talk) 02:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.