The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 13:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)reply
There is not a single reference here, apart from the first one that I can't view, that constitutes a real secondary sources. They are passing mentions, profiles, non-rs links, press-releases. The next block is more of the same so I'm not doing it. It fails
WP:ANYBIO,
WP:BIO,
WP:SIGCOV. The guy is simply non-notable. scope_creepTalk 10:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
BobherryTalkEdits 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 04:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. The dude has a job. When part of your job is to publicize things, it's inevitable that you will be passingly mentioned in a bunch of places, but this does not amount to substantial coverage in secondary sources. Nothing on this page is any different from anyone else who has the job, and wikipedia isn't one's resume.
FalconK (
talk) 08:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and discussion above.
Oaktree b (
talk) 02:43, 19 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.