The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Seems to meet
WP:GNG. The book Transformationen probably constitutes a reliable source: it includes work by art historians Hans Wichmann
[1] and Friedrich Piel
[2] and academic Aloys Goergen
[3]. She also has coverage in New York Times
[4], which is not something a run-of-the-mill German artist gets, as well as in this applied art magazine
[5], newspapers
[6][7] and some briefer coverage
[8][9] --
Colapeninsula (
talk) 16:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
And 620 standard Google hits and 0 (zero) on Google News. The Bannertalk 16:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)reply
That there is not enough evidence of her being notable. A few links, often based on press releases, is not enough. The Bannertalk 12:35, 27 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep. Colapeninsula's analysis looks to be right on target.
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (
talk) 19:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
KTC (
talk) 09:34, 8 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep The article is purely factual. The artist has exhibitions recorded on the page in at least 5 countries and in multiple mediums, one of which she is pioneering. Seems notable and well supported.--
User:Imhr — Preceding
undated comment added 14:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.