The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Except being Chief Minister's wife, she has no notability. Her page was created after her husband became Chief Minister. Moreover, being an owner of a local news channel can not make her eligible for Wiki. Requesting higher level to look up the matter. -
Arunudoy (
talk) 01:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—
cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Sources appear to meet
WP:BASIC. Notability is of course not inherited, but spouses of powerful politicians are often notable for that reason. Plus, there is significant coverage of her outside of her relation to her husband, so it should meet notability on that alone. ––
FormalDudetalk 02:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment Kindly check the source links. Are those sources? Additionally, whatever coverage you are seeing is linked to her husband only. No coverage without a link to her husband. In addition, she is just Chief Minister's wife, not Prime Minister or Governer or President's wife. All of her business started after her husband became Minister of the state. Political power induced money? --
Arunudoy (
talk) 03:04, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
I think you are mistaken about what counts for notability. Just because a source mentions her husband, does not meet it is not significant for her biography. The majority of these sources include
significant coverage about Riniki, and while most do mention her husband, he is not the reason they are talking about Riniki. Multiple sources talk about Riniki for her work in law and politics, and in news media. See
[1],
[2],
[3]. ––
FormalDudetalk 04:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
FormalDude Link 2 is her own TV channel (you please check). Please check the links properly. You will better get it. :) --
Arunudoy (
talk) 04:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Link 1 is an article from
Reporters Without Borders about her owning a news media station. It is completely usable and counts towards
WP:GNG. The third link is
dead, my apologies, but please do not believe that automatically means the link is fake. It is real:
Delete The coverage in
WP:RS found above is all focused on corruption allegations. Neither does it appear
WP:SUSTAINED nor can it be covered here due to
WP:BLPCRIME requirement on conviction. The Guwahati Plus source the page currently depends heavily upon, is an interview and hence
WP:PRIMARY (the site does not inspire any confidence about reliability or independence, founder
claims to be a marketing professional).
Her own channel has nothing that amounts to
WP:SIGCOV. --
Hemantha (
talk) 04:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarMississippi 01:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs) 13:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak keep per
WP:BASIC - I share
Hemantha's concerns about the focus of many sources, but per
WP:PUBLICFIGURE, noteworthy, relevant, and well documented allegations may be possible to include (some date back to
2015), and there is biographical and career information reported within as well as in addition to those sources, e.g.
[4],
[5]. I also agree with
FormalDude about
RSF helping support her independent notability and with
Mujinga on the general source assessment.
Beccaynr (
talk) 12:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep passes WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, I see some non-trivial coverage which shows that she is notable in her field.
VocalIndia (
talk) 08:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.