The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Per the uncontested sources. But this will need some cleaning for promotionalism, so tagging
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 21:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as corporate spam. WIkipedia is not a hosting service for this company's office locator and product brochure.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 06:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per previous editors' points.--
SamHolt6 (
talk) 15:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep I find two sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability -
this review of the software and
this article from ubergizmo. Any issues with the article can be fixed by removing overly-promotional text. The article therefore meets
WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG.
-- HighKing++ 15:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To discuss whether the sources establish notability and whether (per editing/deletion policy) removal of the promotional parts is possible instead of deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep The articles from TechCrunch, AnandTech, and Ubergizmo are usable as third-party reliable sources for this topic, and I found additional sources that support this subject passing GNG:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.