The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Is notable under
WP:ORG. "As a general rule, the individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not considered notable enough to warrant a separate article - unless they are substantially discussed by reliable independent sources that extend beyond the chapter's local area.
71.246.200.190 (
talk) 00:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Reply But in this situation, this is not the case. This org is not substantially discussed by 3rd party reliable sources. Thanks.
Ism schism (
talk) 01:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment: I don't know enough yet about the coverage of this sect to know whether its independently notable. But if for some reason it is not, its certainly notable as a part of
Mormon fundamentalism, all verifiable content should be retained.--Milowent • hasspoken 02:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Reply Any reliable sources should be reserved if they exist. But, this subject still is not notable, nor does it meet
WP:GNG. Thanks.
Ism schism (
talk) 02:16, 17 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep. I think it's notable enough as an organization separate from the general Mormon fundamentalist movement. There have been some sourcing issues on the page in the past with members of the church attempting to use their own blogs and website to substantiate information, but there is enough in reliable sources even currently used in the article to justify an article, IMO. The church only has a couple of hundred members, but because of their involvement in polygamy and the construction of their pyramid temple, they have traditionally "punched above their weight" in terms of the notice they attract from media and scholars.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 02:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.