- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 03:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Riedell Skates
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Riedell Skates ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 20:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Minnesota. Shellwood ( talk) 20:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: The link to footnote 1 does not work, but that two-page, 2007 article has been archived at the Wayback Machine. [1] The other source is a bare mention, so notability likely will rest on the first source. Kablammo ( talk) 12:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I recovered some evidence of two earlier references, so some notability is shown. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 11:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - notable per the current refs. Significant coverage. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 01:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Per added sources. / Julle ( talk) 01:23, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.