The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 19:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Richardson International

Richardson International (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP Salimfadhley ( talk) 00:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Salimfadhley ( talk) 00:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Keep Not the best sourced article but being one of the largest private corps in Canada, I think it does meet WP:NCORP. Masterhatch ( talk) 00:23, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Question do you think we'd be better off draftifying it and allowing editors time to improve the sourcing?

We could allow for improving the article or possibly merge relevant info with the parent company James Richardson & Sons. (There's already some info on this article there) Masterhatch ( talk) 01:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Delete per nom Masterhatch ( talk) 00:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Question did you vote twice?

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 00:46, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.