From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 20:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Richard Passamaneck

Richard Passamaneck (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable professor (fails WP:NPROF). I could not find any additional sources. Eligible for BLPPROD, except that it had 2 dead external links that I removed. Brad v 18:41, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 11:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 11:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Citation counts (in Google scholar) are too low to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1 and there seems to be nothing else. — David Eppstein ( talk) 20:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - None of the sources about this person are enough for having the article. Accesscrawl ( talk) 15:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.