The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
NW(
Talk) 21:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
IncaGold as a plausible search term. Otherwise, none of the content in the article is
verifiable, as MobyGames (or Softpedia, which I also came across in my search for something on him) are not
reliable sources. –
MuZemike 21:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep The article is sourced on flotation documentation which by definition is verified and available from the stock-exchange. Three number one hits and hundreds of games sold, that notable. Also this is one of the most notable Swiss in the games industry.
genevoise1291 19:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC) —
genevoise1291 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Delete - Which notability guideline to look at? As a game designer, perhaps
WP:CREATIVE? Have his works "won significant critical attention"? AFAICT, none of the games he is credited with on MobyGames qualify for this. Holmes does not appear to meet the
WP:GNG either (significant, independent coverage).
Marasmusine (
talk) 15:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. This smells of self-promotion. I see primary sources and MobyGames links. The MobyGames links are about as useful as IMDb (interpret that however you wish). The bottom line is there isn't any non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications here, thus the person is failing basic
WP:BIO guidelines.
JBsupreme (
talk) 07:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
IncaGold. The article shows no independent
WP:RS covering the subject, nor I can find ones. Happy to change !vote, as usual, if evidence of notability comes out. --
Cyclopiatalk 15:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. Lack of 3rd party coverage. Name, as used in title, is not a very likely search term, so skip redirect.
Niteshift36 (
talk) 15:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.