The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete agree with nominator's concern, based on unreliable sources. --
Spada 2 ♪♫ (
talk) 12:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep i added some additional sources . i hope the article is better and acceptable now . Additional time is needed for article to be completed.thanks— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Rapefarsiforlife (
talk •
contribs)
I can't see any
reliable source.It's or self-published blog or unreliable site of Persian underground music:)Ladsgroupبحث 23:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment I agree,none of the links can pass
WP:RS, --
Spada II ♪♫ (
talk) 13:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Comment please consider that many good articles started their Wikilife in pretty bad shape.I think more time is needed.thanks
Comment someone is trying to manipulate the disscution, these 2 "keep" are from same person. administator please check. --
Spada II ♪♫ (
talk) 15:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep I'm agree with — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Rapefarsiforlife (
talk •
contribs) . Most of the articles start their wikipedia page quite in bad shape . I personally think the article need some more time to be improved and i can not see any reason for deletion.—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mahmood1234 (
talk •
contribs) 19:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non-notable musician. References are poor. Fails WP:MUSICBIO.
Christopher Connor (
talk) 21:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.