The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 20:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
per
WP:NOT - a list of train data, sourced to another wiki and an Angelfire page, with no claim of encyclopedic importance
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 04:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete appears to be a directory without an text. I think it has its place in an encyclopedia, but this doesn't appear to be that place.
SportingFlyertalk 06:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:NOTDIR. We don't even care about obsessively maintaining make and model catalogues of the active bus fleets of municipal transit systems, let alone documenting the make and model of every bus they used to have but don't anymore. This is
unverifiable trivia, which isn't even interesting let alone encyclopedic — and it's "referenced" entirely to a
user-generated trainspotter wiki and a list on an unreliable
self-published Angelfire site (who knew Angelfire was even still a thing?), which are not
reliable sources for the purposes of making something notable.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.