- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural close to move to userspace. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 02:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Response to Peer Reviews
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Response to Peer Reviews ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page appears to be a response to Wikipedia peer reviews, however it somehow ended up as an article. The nature of the text of the article seems to violate WP:NOTESSAY. JJP...MASTER! [talk to] JJP... master? Edit: It turns out that the "peer review" mentioned in the title refers to a peer review for a Wiki Education assignment. 00:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Move to user space In a situation like this, a helpful response would be to move the page to the user's space (without leaving a redirect), which is likely where it ought to have been in the first place. In this case, I would have moved it to User:Haleymendlin/Response to Peer Reviews. If you agree, we can speedy-close this nomination and move it. Largoplazo ( talk) 01:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy move to user space and close. It's not an article and wasn't meant to be created in main space. It is from a Wiki Education student. There isn't really anything else to discuss. Dylsss( talk contribs) 01:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.