The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Considering speedy delete - from the looks of things (and opinions so far, this seems to be possibly eligible for a
G11 speedy delete. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kirbanzo (
talk •
contribs) 03:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable group, made false claims in order to try and draw attention to itself during Douglas HS shooting. Their claims were briefly repeated, then retracted as fake. Their hoax didn't last long enough to have any lasting impact.
WikiVirusC(talk) 01:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge, or failing that, Keep The topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Their notability did come from the hoax, but it remains that they did receive non-trivial coverage. I would be open to merging it if a suitable location is found.
Acebulf (
talk) 04:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Perhaps merge it with the shooting article itself?
Kirbanzo (
talk) 04:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment it's been discussed in Time, Newsweek, et cetera, but almost all around the exact same time as a result of the shooting. I have no problems with deleting on
WP:ADVOCACY grounds or keeping with some
WP:TNT as it probably satisfies
WP:GNG in some manner, be it event or organization, but not as it currently stands.
SportingFlyertalk 08:06, 2 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge, or failing that, Keep An encyclopedia article should inform. An encyclopedia article does not imply advocacy. For that reason, I believe this should be a merge or a keep, as ugly as this article might become.
Miguel Escopeta (
talk) 21:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete No evidence that this is a substantial group that merits coverage.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 07:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment -- the content has been rejected from the Parkland shooting article here:
Merging this content would be undue in the proposed target and would likely be rejected there again. I thus oppose merge.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 18:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.