The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
BusterD (
talk) 00:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 06:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter(yak) 20:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Weak delete Article does not give any indication that this might meet WP:PROF. The "weak" is because I don't have time to search around for more sources myself, I hope and trust that the nom
has done this. --
Guillaume2303 (
talk) 20:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:PROF. The assertion that her research is "pioneering" is not backed-up by any sources.
Location (
talk) 05:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - After several searches, I have not found coverage in reliable sources. Directory listings exist, such as
this listing on the Rutgers University website, but otherwise, not finding reliable sources that cover this individual. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.