The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 04:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
This article is a
WP:POVFORK created by copying verbatim (without attribution per
WP:COPYWITHIN) from three other Wikipedia articles, while many of the citations were not also copied leaving much of the content unsourced. The name of the article is the title of a writing from a 17th century Portuguese Jesuit and is not a phrase used elsewhere or in present time.
"History" section paragraphs 1-4 & 6 were taken verbatim from the
Tigray Region article. The 5th paragraph (starting By the beginning of the 19th century) was copied verbatim from the
Tigrayans article.
Paragraph 1 of section "First mention of Tigray in ancient sources" was taken verbatim from
Tigray Province. Paras 2-4 were taken verbatim from
Tigrayans with the citations stripped out of it.
The section "Rulers of Tigray" was copied verbatim from
Tigray Province.
There was discussion on the article's talk page that the article was a hoax, and I was unable to verify much content until I realized it was a poor "copy job" from elsewhere, taken out of context and with some of the citations missing or moved around. Not salvageable.
Platonk (
talk) 03:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Wikipedia should not host historical hoaxes.--
Ermenrich (
talk) 14:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete a comical hoax article, and the creator's other edits and article creations should be investigated.
Dawit S Gondaria (
talk) 19:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per all above.
Oaktree b (
talk) 21:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Ue3lman (
talk) 10:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Tigray Region -- The title is a conceivable search term, though Reino is likely to be Portuguese for kingdom.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per WP:POVFORK, WP:COPYWITHIN, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH. To add to Dawit's comment above:
User:Thingsomyipisntvisable is also subject to an
investigation into a series of copyvios on Commons (where nominator Platonk has also claimed that Thingsomyipisntvisable's two maps of Tigr are 'bunk'); their disruptive behaviour appears persistent and a threat to the project.
Nederlandse Leeuw (
talk) 21:20, 31 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.