The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 07:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Working voice actress, no sign she passes either
WP:GNG or
WP:NACTOR. Was de-prodded with the following rationale: "Improving; I object because the Chinese Wikipedia has the best Japanese celebrities and she has one". However, that addressed neither of the above two concerns.
Onel5969TT me 15:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Was originally going to argue that the voice of
Lucy Ricardo is presumably important to the history of Japanese voice-acting, and just hard to look up because of the language barrier, but then I decided to go take a spin with Google translate and check. I stand by the original argument, but Reiko Senou is not the original Lucy Ricardo. That's
ja:桜京美, about whom we should but seemingly do not have an article. --
erachimatalk 10:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete For once the English article contains just as many roles as the Ja.wiki age, which makes this a lot easier. I can't see anything suggesting notability by our standards, although I'm open to changing that view if information develops. The deprod rationale is poor even when making some sense of it - the existence of articles on other wiki's has no bearing unless they contain information of use to this discussion.
SephyTheThird (
talk) 17:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.