The result was delete. henrik• talk 19:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I can't find enough significant coverage in reliable sources to prove that this lawyer is notable. The article has 4 references, but they all just prove he is actually a lawyer. I'm sure it's nice to be a lawyer, but I don't think it makes you inherently notable. Article's subject fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 22:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply
I don't want to read tons of guidelines, what I want is to understand the rationale. Why are villages, no matter how small and insignificant, automatcally notable even without any references at all, while lawyers need more than 11 references (how many exactly and how detailed) to be included here? What else at Wikipedia does not require any references for support? Ottawahitech ( talk) 14:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply
all this is in the article supported by several secondary reliable sources. Ottawahitech ( talk) 03:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC) reply