The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
RL0919 (
talk) 22:04, 13 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - Per Bearian, in addition, as per concerns about lack of in-depth coverage: WGN is a major media company, covering in-depth [Citation 8]. Washington Post covered his political controversies in-depth [Citation 23]. Chicago Tribune covered his business dealings in-depth [Citation 6]. After more research, I've added [Citation 24] in which PBS covers him in-depth. I also swapped a Crunchbase profile reference with an in-depth article from Crain's Chicago Business at [Citation 5]. Citations 2 and 25 are also in-depth.
Isingness (
talk) 21:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Passes general notability guidelines, especially in the Chicagoland area.
Missvain (
talk) 05:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.