The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. With the amount of proper citations in the article now, I feel this passes WP:N. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 04:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Rapid River (video game)

Rapid River (video game) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This game does not meet the notability guidelines. Nothing I could find proves that this is deserving of its own page. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 16:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 16:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep I have substantial changes to make to the page, including new references that show it is deserving of its own page. These major edits should make the page suitable to remain (I will be ready to add them by the end of this weekend). I have tried to settle this in the talk page, but my most recent messages have been ignored. On top of this, I am concerned that initially the page was just redirected to a generic list of Namco games, effectively deleting all its content, which isn't following the proper procedure. Who knows how many other Namco pages have been pseudo removed in this way to avoid any discussion on keeping pages? kingjuliando :^) 09:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • I redirected a lot of these Namco pages because none offer any significant coverage from sources. I don't have the time to mark every single one of those for deletion, and I can see these being suitable redirects, hence my decision. So I don't see how that "isn't following the proper procedure", since WP:R says that is allowable. None of the sources you added provide any significant coverage anyway, all of it is just mentions in pages for other games. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 15:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC) reply
    • Sorry I think there's been a misunderstanding; we haven't updated the page yet to include the numerous references I mentioned. As I suggested on the talk page, maybe the best course of action is to revoke this deletion request for the time being and wait for the updated version of the page (which should be completed by this weekend)? I'm obviously happy to notify you of the updated version to see if you're happy with it! Is that a fair compromise for the moment (as I'm not sure how quickly these deletion requests get reviewed)? kingjuliando :^) 16:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep As KingJulianDO promised to update the page with more references. I'm busy reworking a game list for a computer but i can help to find the game's exact release date after i'm done with the list, assuming the page is not deleted by the time i finish with that endeavor... Roberth Martinez ( talk) 17:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC) reply
  • That comes off as WP:CRYSTALBALL. I need to see these for myself before I change my decision. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 17:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.