The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –  Joe ( talk) 12:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Ramani Durvasula

Ramani Durvasula (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely a promotional article WP:PROMO. Can't identify her nor see why she is notable. Fails WP:BIO as no credible citations are available that talks about her at the first place. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens ( talk) 11:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 11:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hatchens ( talk) 11:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep per WP:SNOW.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 19:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC) reply

  Esprit15d, could you explain how the snowball clause applies here? Java Hurricane 04:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep WP:AUTHOR WP:GNG Dr. Ramani is an author, a well known expert on NPD, and popular and influential youtuber with over 300k followers and millions of views. She has been featured on a number of other shows and publications as an expert in narcissism. I came to wikipedia to learn about her history and personal life, surprised that her page is marked for possible deletion. Definitely keep. I agree that the article appears very rough, reads like promo material, and should be improved, however. Metaldev ( talk) 05:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete despite the promotional refbombing, no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. The sources that are independent or reliable are not significant and vice-versa. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 13:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC) reply

*Keep. Lots of sources in the article. Apple731a ( talk) 08:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC) Struck !vote from blocked disruption-only account editing here to WP:GAME autoconfirmed. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.