The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Courcelles 19:26, 17 August 2011 (UTC)reply
There are no railway stations in Bhutan.
bobrayner (
talk) 18:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete, do I really need to say anything else? Ten Pound Hammer,
his otters and a clue-bat • (
Otters want attention) 19:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Only reference from 2009 says a railway from India to Bhutan and Nepal is "planned". Article can be recreated once we have solid references stating it is approved and under construction.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 20:48, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete - It looks like my deletionist and inclusionist friends above are in agreement on this... I'm still looking forward to that
Native snakes of Hawaii article.
Carrite (
talk) 22:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment Deletionist? Inclusionist? I used the AfD analysis tool developed by
User:Snottywong to take a look at my most recent 250 AfD recommendations. I recommended "Delete" 49.2% of the time and "Keep" 45.4% of the time. I recommended "Redirect" 4.6% of the time. My recommendations matched consensus 86.7% of the time, didn't match consensus 6.2% of the time, and there was no consensus 7.1% of the time. Please note that I am usually among the first to comment, because I am not interested in hopping on bandwagons, plus I often edit on a smart phone that chokes on lengthy debates. So am I a deletionist or an inclusionist? As for
Native snakes of Hawaii, my recommendation is the same as for
Beach resorts of Bhutan.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 06:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment - Hey, cool toy! I'm an inclusionist (even got hauled to ANI over my Utterly Out of Control and Thoroughly Disruptive Inclusionism </sarc>) and my numbers are 44.5% Keep and 51.4% Delete... Yep, you're an inclusionist, all right, Cullen. Mr. Hammer is 7.3% Keep and 89.9% Delete. So, I'm not gonna retract a word of the above. Slick work, Mr. Snotty... Technology is swell.
Carrite (
talk) 04:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC) Last edit:
Carrite (
talk) 16:08, 16 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.