The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( non-admin closure) NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Raef al Hasan Rafa

Raef al Hasan Rafa (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly unsourced article that does not make clear what his personal notability is. Looks like self-promo. The Banner  talk 00:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 18:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Comment I feel notability could be established using few sources already listed in the article and finding some more. The present article is a total self-promotion, though. It requires to be re-written since the beginning. For now I'd suggest it to move to the creator's userspace to work on, to make it in compliance with WP:PG. Anupmehra - Let's talk! 18:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Something fishy is going on, now I had to restore the AfD and maintenance templates AGAIN. This is now the fourth time someone had to restore those templates... The Banner  talk 12:07, 19 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:17, 19 February 2014 (UTC) reply

• Weak keep/Wikify This article needs help, but notability seems established within the article's references. There's a lot of stuff here that doesn't belong though, like COI editing and non-reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaintedCarpet ( talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{( speak to me)} 09:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 13:23, 7 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.