The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 05:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Appears to be a content fork from
Innovation. As far as I can see, there is no coherent concept called "radical innovation", distinct from innovation, that extends beyond any single scholar. It's just a common
collocation meaning more profound innovation. Also concerns about self-promotion.
Comment left on talkpage back in April; no one has responded. So going ahead with AFD.
OsFish (
talk) 06:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - The two sources cited in the first paragraph contradict each other (either the concept is pretty much interchangeable with disruptive innovation, per Mary Pratt, or it's something quite different, per Daniel Newman) and the paragraph does nothing to reconcile them. Like the nom, I find no coherent concept here: this does not rise to the level of original research. —
Charles Stewart(talk) 12:22, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.