From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Radha Mangeshkar

Radha Mangeshkar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of the article lacks notability, and the article itself reads like it was written by a marketing department. There's no reason for this article to exist in its current state. Supertanno ( talk) 14:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 ( talk) 21:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete The news coverage given is not enough. Should be deleted. Laptopinmyhands ( talk) 02:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Of the five references, 2 are deadlinks, 2 are from what appear to be non-reliable blogs, and the other appears to be a PR writeup given that there is a marketing pitch as the end. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 21:53, 19 February 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.