- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 19:49, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Rachel Schmeidler
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rachel Schmeidler ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. PepperBeast (talk) 22:13, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the mugshot series is enduring. Here it is prominently mentioned in a 2020 El Pais article. Lots of other coverage available, so meets GNG. --- Possibly ☎ 23:15, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, easily meets GNG. Randy Kryn ( talk) 10:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 21:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 21:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per
WP:CREATIVE, including thanks to improvements to the article since it was nominated for deletion; per the sources, she
has created a [...] well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work [has] been the primary subject [...] of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
And it appears she founded an art gallery; WP:BASIC statesIf the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability
, so this also appears to be satisfied by the WP:SUSTAINED coverage over time. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.