The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to
Miss Oregon where the information is best presented in context as part of a list. The proposed redirect does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. In this case, she lost her title three weeks later for a technical violation (not resident in Oregon).
Legacypac (
talk) 05:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep as her notability is for winning the
Miss Oregon title and
notability is not temporary. Subject easily crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds with significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Her term as Miss Oregon was just barely shorter than
William Henry Harrison's as President of the United States and both had about equal impact on world history. Fortunately for both of them, notability is a threshold, not a competition. -
Dravecky (
talk) 18:29, 9 December 2015 (UTC)reply
You can't be serious. Ya we know it's your article, but given that Miss Oregon accomplishs nothing in a year, doing nothing for three weeks is even less.
Legacypac (
talk) 22:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
See also
WP:NTEMP which says "In particular, if reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual."
Legacypac (
talk) 20:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Can you point to a policy that says winning this award confers notability or how this person is not a low profile individual barred from an article per NTEMP ?
Legacypac (
talk) 22:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)reply
I can't think of a major pageant winner in the United States who isn't found to meet WP:GNG at AFD, at least that's a very very common outcome. Pageants are dumb, but so are sports. That's life.--Milowent • hasspoken 05:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)reply
I've participated in dozens of AfDs of state pageant winners that were deleted or redirected. Not all, but a lot go delete or redirect
Legacypac (
talk) 12:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.