The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Completely unsourced abandoned article and no source to support notability. Qed237(talk) 11:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Withdrawn by nominator – After reading the comments and seeing that reliable sources has been added to the article, I withdraw my nomination as it now seems to pass
WP:GNG. Qed237(talk) 14:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Neither "unsourced" nor "abandoned" are reasons for deletion. It certainly looks like sources exist, and if the festival existed, it would surely be notable.
StAnselm (
talk) 18:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Unnecessary nomination as per the article's importance is concerned. —
14.96.155.218 (
talk)
Keep Notable enough to have an article.
117.221.122.229 (
talk) 12:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Very notable cultural festival. The nominator is mad or what?
219.64.178.76 (
talk)
Comment – The article creator SWASTIK 25 has been blocked as a sockmaster and has edited by proxy, so I would not be suprised if the IP's above belong to him as they have edited only this AfD or the same articles as SWASTIK 25. Qed237(talk) 14:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep – As nominator, I have now seen sources been added and it looks notable, so it can be kept and my nomination is withdrawn. Qed237(talk) 14:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.