The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (
talk) 00:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Strong delete. Looks like self-glorification at its worst.
Chris Neville-Smith (
talk) 18:30, 10 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Speedy deletion candidate in my view - possible G3, borderline G11, definite A7.
BenMacDui 20:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete - lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability --
Whpq (
talk) 16:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.