From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ausar Auset Society. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Ra Un Nefer Amen

Ra Un Nefer Amen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Correct me if I'm wrong but WP:BISHOPS #1 suggest that they're notable only if they are a major figure within a major world religion. I would assume that the Ausar Auset Society does not qualify under this category (given the coverage, size of article, and absence from the major religion article). So in addition to the lack of coverage, I'm not sure if this subject is notable. BriefEdits ( talk) 19:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Merge to Ausar Auset Society. Jahaza ( talk) 20:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Comment It's not just about the size of the organization, but the profile and function. What the Mormon church calls Bishops are the equivalent of Pastors in Christian churches. FWIW, I agree with the merger, assuming the notability of the society itself can be clearly established. Jclemens ( talk) 20:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Comment Merging seems alright to me. — BriefEdits ( talk) 15:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.