The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unsourced orphan that doesn't seem to meet the GNG
3gg5amp1e (
talk) 18:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. First, being an orphan does not automatically qualify an article for deletion. The subject also does seem to satisfy GNG, since I was able to find
multiple books which seem to provide enough coverage for at least a decent stub. I would also recommend that you read
WP:BEFORE. --
Biblioworm 02:21, 16 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.