The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. In the three weeks this has been open, no significant treatment of the topic in reliable sources has been adduced to rebut the "delete" arguments.
Deor (
talk) 14:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Copied and pasted from a then-unreviewed AfC draft, I am unable to find sources which meet
WP:CORP /
WP:CORPDEPTH that provide in-depth, arm's length coverage of this organization.
j⚛e deckertalk 06:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
delete the sources provided are not even about the subject but Quebec educational legislation.
LibStar (
talk) 11:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Might become notable enough, but I can't say it is at present--what the article is however is advocacy, plain and simple. The same rules apply as to advertising, regardless of our sympathies. The only [possibly neutral reference is the article in Journal of Unschooling and Alternative Learning , but it is unfortunaely an article about one particular school, with not a single word about this network. Have Marcinoneword and Salvorisen actually read it? DGG (
talk ) 20:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.