The result was no consensus. Stifle ( talk) 19:55, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. All the sources cited in the article are primary. Google searches failed to turn up anything useful. Previous AfD outcome in 2007 was keep, but only because it was a brand-new article, not because there was evidence of notability. Msnicki ( talk) 10:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Do not delete, let them make a revision The Qi Programming language is an important conceptual development. It brings types and logic progamming to functional programming. It might not be the most efficient logic programming language implementation, but it might give a good future prespective a possible integration of both worlds. It is in competition with other approaches such as Closure/Kanren and you name it. Janburse ( talk) 14:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Edit: Hi Andy,
I guess Qi and Shen are supposed to be two different products although not independent. They share some properties:
http://www.shenlanguage.org/Documentation/shendoc.htm#Shen%20and%20Qi:%20differences
So they can be both notable independently, Qi is even supposed to have its own license. But on the other hand we find the verb superceded here:
http://www.lambdassociates.org/wiki.htm
Which indecates that Qi and Shen are not branches, but Shen is a subsequent release of Qi. Janburse ( talk) 15:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply