The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (
talk) 03:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete - lacks the coverage needed to establish notability --
Whpq (
talk) 18:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete. per
WP:CORP. Of the 21 links to so called sources, most of them are to Wikipedia pages, others are to directories or other trade organisations; none are actually about QED National in a way that asserts its notability. The reference section is a perfect example of scraping the barrel.--
Kudpung (
talk) 04:30, 1 August 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.