The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seems to be the only contents of this article is the plot. Also, there are no reliable references
Hallows AG (
talk) 01:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete and Re-write - the article has been badly written, not easily understandable owing to its too long narative without any paragraphing or structured sections.--
SubContinentalAnalyst (
talk) 09:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)reply
There's nothing stopping you from rewriting this without it first being deleted.
Phil Bridger (
talk) 19:34, 14 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
WifioneMessage 11:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep. Insufficient content beyond a plot, no reliable references, and being badly written are reasons to improve the article, not to delete it. It seems improvement is already underway.
Gnome de plume (
talk) 12:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r -
TP 16:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep - The article could be improved, but the series' airing on
STAR One suggests notability.
ItsZippy(
talk •
contributions) 17:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.