- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 23:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Punyal clan
- Punyal clan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Part of the Jat clans category. Not a notable topic. Just a couple lines with one reference, clan is not worth an article, fails WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 13:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 16. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 13:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; clear GNG failure Spiderone 21:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. It's possible that sources exist online or in another language, but I could not find any online sources in English. Even if the coverage in Handbook for the Indian Army Dogras is substantial, the GNG requires more than one source. -- Cerebellum ( talk) 16:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.