The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand(
talk) 14:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - I cleaned up the advertisement and listspam, and what remains isn't even enough for me to understand what ProudNet is supposed to be. Unsourced and unsourceable to any reliable sources. ☺ ·
Salvidrim! ·
✉ 00:35, 4 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete – it's a non-article.
EBY (
talk) 16:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Article topic lacks
significant coverage from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) It did not have any meaningful hits in a
video game reliable sources search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets, such as a developer or a game that uses the technology. (The only one that mentions it is
Vindictus and that part isn't even sourced.) Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar
♔ 01:21, 6 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Advert. Failure of GNG
Mr. Guye (
talk) 01:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete: Sadly, no evidence of notabilty. Article fails
WP:GNG as a result of insignificant coverage to
reliable sources.
Wikicology (
talk) 21:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - Per
WP:GNG, the nom, Salvidrim, etc. There's virtually no content left anyways.
Sergecross73msg me 15:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Edit - I have recognized the problem and edited with an objective point of view. hyej (
talk) 17:08, 9 October 2014 (GMT)
For the record, the article still has no sources czar
♔ 14:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete unsourced advert by non-notable e-tech company.
Cramyourspam (
talk) 14:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete As with everyone else above, I can't find any sources that establish notability.
I am One of Many (
talk) 18:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.