The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Many of the sources appear to be
WP:RS; independent, secondary sources with editorial independence and control. Nigerian media seems overall to be unashamedly likely to praise those they see as worthies, but that and the
WP:COI and lack of
WP:NPOV in the article are content issues. There are definitely sources to indicate independent notability.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 15:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton |
Talk 17:10, 28 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep A respectable amount of sources already in the article, and it looks like there's plenty more where that came from.
TimothyJosephWood 13:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.