The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. —C.Fred (
talk) 00:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep -
not so fast. Accusation is supported by evidence and literally thousands of documents. It was reported by newspapers and reliable sources across the world. Trump just said Netanyahu proved him right. Let's wait for more information on the news instead of rushing to delete this article.--
יניב הורון (
talk) 21:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - I don't think whether if the claim is legitimate or not is the largest concern. Since it has impacted Trump's decision-making on an important deal, one can argue this accusation has
lasting significance.
TheGracefulSlick (
talk) 22:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep as יניב הורון and GracefulSlick say.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 22:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep As something literally supported by thousands of documents, and that it's been noted to affect real word decision making as we speak (Trump on the nuke deal), simply deleting this because Mossad delivered it would be absurd.
Thelovelyconch (
talk) 23:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep The sheer volume of support and the facts and consequences of this clearly pass
WP:GNG - GalatzTalk 23:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - If the story dies, it can always be merged into another article. Presently, however, the story has legitimate RSs and considerable traction.
The Kingfisher (
talk) 00:33, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.