The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 05:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Production of Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame

Production of Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this is FORK of both Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame and seems fancruft. This has too many information that is not required and could easily be compressed and merged in the respective pages. If anything, I suggest creating a new one like Production of the Avengers films or Production of MCU films, which honestly would be better off. The existence of this kind of pages promotes too many unnecessary content. All the Avengers films have the same level of production value I believe. A good example is Production of the James Bond films. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 10:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 10:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Keep @ ImmortalWizard: You should have discussed this first on the talk page. Noone is saying that these two films do not have the same level of production as other Avengers films. The point of this article is that these two films in particular were produced together and thus share much of the same information. So instead of repeating the same information, we placed it in a central location. See Production of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows as another example.— TriiipleThreat ( talk) 12:54, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Thanks for letting me know about the other example. If I had known that earlier, I would have went for MULTIAFD. Even if they were produced together, I don't see any point of FORKing in a stand alone with so many unnecessary info. THE NEW ImmortalWizard (chat) 15:32, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep per TriiipleThreat. Mosaicberry ( talk) 13:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Triiiple's points, and to elaborate a little the point of this article is that a lot of the content in it would be unnecessarily duplicated if we split it between the two film articles since content from this article applies to both films, which is why this article was created to begin with. - adamstom97 ( talk) 08:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep as a valid split from two clearly notable articles, page size matters as per WP:NOTPAPER and this article is a sensible creation Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:03, 8 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep per TriiipleThreat. Zuko Halliwell ( talk) 03:29, 9 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep It’s not uncommon for back-to-back films to have articles on production. See: Principal photography of The Lord of the Rings film series as well as the above-mentioned Deathly Hallows article. Toa Nidhiki05 18:41, 9 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep per TriiipleThreat's points, and because important information concerning Infinity War's and Endgame's joint production would be lost. ARZ100 ( talk) 21:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Keep Considering the merit of the similar nature of the productions, I'll have to agree with keeping. Garlicolive ( talk) 02:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Speedy keep per TriiipleThreat. Calling this fancruft is completely inaccurate. Sock (tock talk) 14:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.